ROI (Return on Investment)

 

ROR (Return on Relationship) is the value accrued by a person or a brand due to nurturing a relationship. ROI (Return on Investment) is simple dollars and cents. ROR is the value (perceived and real) that will accrue over time through loyalty, recommendations, and sharing.

Networkization of societies has contributed to an exponential increase in the number of relationships, both, face-to-face and virtual. This relationships abundance has made people and businesses think how they can build and maintain value-added relationships? How can they decide the intensity and closeness of relationships? The tendency has led to developments in the concept of Return on Relationships (RoR).

talent v/s Skill

 By the term talent, we mean a special ability to do something possessed by a person naturally. It is something, which you do the best without putting extra efforts into it.

Skills refer to an ability or an expertise in performing a task, obtained by a person through systematic learning, practice or experience. It is the outcome of continuous efforts and improvements made to gain proficiency.

There are a few differences between talent and skill which is explained in the given below points:
▪️The term talent refers to an inborn and the special ability of a person to do something. A skill is an expertise, which is acquired by the person by learning.
▪️Talent is God gifted ability, whereas Skill is an ability in which you put your time and efforts to develop.
▪️Talent is often possessed by a limited number of people. On the other hand, any person can learn a particular skill, if he has the capacity, capability, and willingness.
▪️Talent is hidden, that is why it needs recognition. As opposed to Skill, requires development, which can only be possible through practice.
▪️Coaching may prove helpful in getting the best out of someone i.e. talent. Conversely, training is necessary for acquiring a skill, to put your best into something useful.

What is Physics?

 

Key Questions

• Question #c8aad

  This question touches on the philosophy of science. It might be answered with a discussion of the distinctions between the sciences. But there is really a lot of overlap in fields like physical-chemistry, bio-physics, and a number of other subfields. One wonders if the traditional three fields of science will maintain their distinction.

  But you requested a simple statement. And physicists like to keep things simple. We ignore friction, or gravity, or assume that the geometry can be simplified. This separates the problem into simple components.

  Why is sky blue?
  What keeps the birds up?
  Why is water wet?
  Why does fire burn?

  These are questions for which physics can offer some reasonable explanations; refraction, dispersion, gravity, forces, molecular cohesion, thermodynamic equilibrium. These answers cover a range of fields including optics, biology, chemistry, fluid dynamics, and many others. But most scientists think of the fundamental reason for these answers as the "physics" of the problem.